Damage Control: What Ken Ham Should Have Said


140007 02/15/2014

There has been so much disillusioned commentary about the recent Ken Ham/Bill Nye evolution-versus-creation debate that it’s time to set things straight.

First, John’s boralogue frames the issue by explaining how a debate is supposed to work, and reminds listeners that one debate does not definitively settle a controversy. A successful debate relies on good participants and proper framing of issues.

Then we’ll target specific areas where neo-Darwinism is in serious trouble, namely in the the origin of information contained in living cells. These problems are acknowledged at the theoretical level but denied at the pop science level and in high school classes. Dr. Stephen Meyer, Ph.D., author of Darwin’s Doubt (www.darwinsdoubt.org), returns to the program for incisive commentary on this problem.

Russ Miller from Creation Ministries (www.creationministries.org) guests again for a point-by-point rebuttal of many issues raised by Bill Nye during the debate with Ken Ham.

Want more resources on these topics? Here are some previous programs you might find interesting:
Share this post:
Login and listen now with your Premium membership!

Not a current Premium member? Subscribe or upgrade to listen to this show and access the Members-Only podcast on all your devices. Get more with your Premium membership: Access the Premium Daily podcast and over a thousand other full-length episodes spanning two decades, as well as enter the Veritas Lounge for videos, downloads and more!

Follow us on Twitter @steelonsteelpro as well as the Steel on Steel Facebook page and remember to join our dedicated Facebook group Praying for Persecuted Christians for the latest information concerning persecuted Christians around the world. Don’t forget to stop by our YouTube channel as well for our latest videos.

Reader's opinions

One thought on “Damage Control: What Ken Ham Should Have Said

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *