The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or IPCC has issued a new report and the collective climate alarmists are doing what they always do – forecasting doom unless we do something drastic. John flies solo for today's podcast, looking at not only the latest climate code red but past predictions of planetary doom that have predictably gone unrealized. There is some sound science in the new report, but the media latch on to all of the dire and crazy predictions. John shows the severe cutbacks recommended in the report in order to save the planet. Politics has distorted the science so much so that we cannot even debate the reality of these cutbacks.
We are all doomed by 2030. No, I mean 2052. Wait a minute….2070?? Why do the goal posts on climate change's ultimate 'change-or-we-all-perish' date keep moving? Joining us today is Aaron Brown (reason.com), Statistics Instructor at NYU, who looks behind the panic to determine what's really going on. The prevailing focus seems to be on human-caused warming to the detriment of all other studies that say the opposite. This evokes a moral response and feeds the panic that it's all over in 12 years or so. John finishes out the podcast, calling on Professor Brown's statistical and financial knowledge, to ask about interest rates and inflation. Are we having 1970s déjà vu?
In his speech before a sparse joint session of Congress, Joe Biden uttered the following unscripted words on climate change, "If we do everything perfectly, it's not going to ultimately matter." Well, if that is the case, why are we spending trillions of dollars in taxpayer money to try and fix it? Joining us today is Steve Milloy, Founder of the climate information website JunkScience.com. He points out that even though apparently their solutions won't matter, they are still pushing forward with them to the point where instead of Covid lockdowns, we will have climate lockdowns. So if it won't work, why do it? The answer just may be about ultimate control over everything.
One key measure at the heart of our divide in this country is the definition of core values. In this week's boralogue, John looks at the egregious things proposed and enacted by those in charge, using the crisis as an excuse, and the protests rising up against them. Inside the division, it all comes down to the definition of core values: their core values, which go against constitutional freedoms, are vastly different than ours.
Is there a population control aspect related to this virus and others that came before it? Back with us is long-time friend of the program, historian and former Senior Associate at the Department of Education, Dennis Cuddy. He focuses on how elites have historically been using viruses, among other things, to further their globalist goals, and how this current virus was predicted back in 2015.
How are the climate alarmists dealing with this virus crisis? Rupert Darwell (www.whwg.com), Consulting Director at the White House Writers Group, joins us from England to discuss how the global warming narrative seems to be sputtering amidst the global pandemic. He also looks at the geopolitics and future of climate alarmism.
Finally John welcomes Allie Parker (www.darkallieadvocacy.weebly.com), wife, mother, and family advocate, who examines the scary phenomenon of medical kidnapping and the weaponization of child protective services. After experiencing it herself, Allie now provides guidance to innocent parents who have been falsely accused of child abuse.
John's quote of the week:
“Whenever utopian thinking comes in, not only does there have to be control of population and what they think and what they do, but also who gets to live and who gets to die based on some system that's set up by the elites. And by the way, they are never the first ones to go.”
On this week's extra segment, we play John's recent appearance on radio program It Seems To Me with Spokane radio legend Tom Read. They discuss how badly media has behaved during the Trump administration era and how lopsided to the left their information is. They also mention that if a radio program or station is important to listeners, they should support them.