Remember when the Steele dossier and Russia collusion stories were stated as absolute fact by nearly every single media outlet? Remember when there ended up being no evidence to back them up? Back with us today is independent writer, author and media consultant Jack Cashill (cashill.com). He points to a recent, low-key, not covered at all retraction by the New York Times indicating not that they were wrong, but that they were duped into believing the dossier. They are not only trying to save their reputation, but also the reputations of those high up in the previous Obama administration. It's all part of a gradual information dissemination strategy to minimize the impact when the truth finally comes out.
We've heard stories for months about Hunter Biden and Burisma and possible corruption while Joe Biden was Vice President. Now a new set of stories are out about Hunter Biden's laptop and further data that could point to widespread corruption. What does it all mean? Back with us today is Reuben Johnson, military expert based in Kiev, Ukraine. He looks at how biased the media is in favor of the democrats and how differently they covered the Steel dossier story. Members of the Obama administration were in on the Trump persecution as well in 2016. He covers how Russia and Eastern European politics work and how that part of the world views the laptop corruption controversy.